![]() splitext ( input )įor i in range ( 0, yPieces ): for j in range ( 0, xPieces ):īox = ( j * width, i * height, ( j + 1 ) * width, ( i + 1 ) * height )Ī. argv ) # The splitimage function def splitimage ( input, xPieces, yPieces ):įilename, file_extension = os. exit ( 1 ) # Check for the right given arg length if len ( sys. Here's the Python script code: #!/usr/bin/env python # -*- coding:utf-8 -*- # splitimage - splits an image into rows x cols pieces # First do a: # pip install Pillow # or: # python -m pip install Pillow # import osįrom PIL import Image # Prints out the Usage information def Usage (): print ( "Usage: %s imagefile rows cols" % ( sys. The image pieces will be generated/placed into same path where the given image file resides! ![]() and it will split the as an argument given " imagefile" according to the given " rows" and " cols" number arguments into (in this case 3x4=12) image pieces. or if you rename it to just " splitimage" instead of " splitimage.py" and give it via chmod +x execution rights, you can call it like an executable. The tiles seem to "remember" some of the pattern history and might behave a bit oddly when an image is placed, and there might also be something OS specific but fitting is nevertheless easy, and the control works greatly as an image splitter. But as shown above, both methods might require "nudging" and scaling up to have proper fitting. Perhaps there is some logic that explains this behavior but I cannot detect it.ĮDIT: It seems to be related to the way the rectangles are initially created (whether drawn individually or copied), and probably also the order. That is, when grouped, the rectangles get filled as per "tile" size (until "nudged" to full grid width/height), when non-grouped, the image is scaled directly to the grid width (height). ![]() On the other hand, as I just tested this on Windows, I get the following results: perhaps it is related somehow to image size, or perhaps the OS version, as when I try this with the images large enough to fill the grid without stretching, I get identical behavior either way (grouped or non-grouped). If grouped you simply wiggle the centre node and the bitmap fill will adjust in one go But you'll need to manually adjust to make it fit ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |